A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/20863Keywords:
directive on improving working conditions in platform work, gender, care, domestic work, work-life balanceAbstract
The Directive on improving working conditions in platform work challenges deeply entrenched inequalities in platform work by regulating some aspects of the labour process that remain unregulated in most EU Member States. The Directive is the outcome of labour struggles and court cases that have taken place during the past years against the misclassification of platform workers as independent self-employed contractors and the non-transparent usage of algorithms in human resources management. Nevertheless, the Directive is gender blind and obscures intersectional aspects of algorithmic management. In the text of the directive there are few references to “gender” or to “women” and important issues like work-life balance, equal pay for equal work, sexual harassment, intersectional gender discrimination, or paid maternity and paternity leaves are mentioned but not considered. Based on the relevant literature, the article explores the gendered challenges that will emerge from its implementation especially regarding reproductive labour and algorithmic biases. More specifically the analysis uses existing research on intersectional gender inequalities from different areas of platform work, mostly crowdwork and domestic and care work, to explore how it will impact on the platform economy. The paper concludes by arguing that the fact that the Directive obscures the specific forms that gender inequality takes in platforms will further exasperate intersectional gender inequalities and discrimination in platform work
References
Adams‐Prassl A., Berg J., When Home Affects Pay: An Analysis of the Gender Pay Gap Among Crowdworkers, SSRN, 2017, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3048711
Aloisi A., Platform work in Europe: Lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead, in European Labour Law Journal, 2022, 13, 1, 4-29.
Aloisi A., Rainone S., Countouris N., An unfinished task? Matching the Platform Work Directive with the EU and international "social acquis", ILO Working Paper, 2023, 101, Geneva: International Labour Office.
Arabadjieva K., Franklin P., Home-based telework, gender and the public-private divide, in N. Countouris, V. De Stefano, A. Piasna, S. Rainone (eds.) The future of remote work, ETUI, 2023, 61-81.
Altenried M., The platform as factory: Crowdwork and the hidden labour behind artificial intelligence, in Capital & Class, 2020, 44 2, 145-158.
Anwar A. M., Platforms of inequality: Gender dynamics of digital labour in Africa, in Gender & Development, 2022, 30, 3, 747-764.
Bacchi C., Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems, Sage Publications, 1999.
Bacchi C., Goodwin, S., Poststructural Policy Analysis: A Guide to Practice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Bauriedl S., Strüver A., Platform Urbanism: Technocapitalist Production of Private and Public Spaces, in Urban Planning, 2020, 5, 4, 267-276.
Benvegnu C., Kambouri N., Platformization beyond the point of production: Reproductive labour and gender roles in the ride-hailing and food delivery sectors, in South Atlantic Quarterly, 2021, 120, 4, 733-747.
Bessa I., Joyce S., Neumann D., et al. A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour platforms, ILO Working Paper No. 70, Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2022.
Bourgery-Gonse T., At long last, EU countries adopt the platform work directive, EURACTIV https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/at-long-last-eu-countries-adopt-the-platform-work-directive/
Carbone J., Cahn N. and Levit N., Discrimination by Design?, in Arizona State Law Journal, 2019, 51, 1, n.p.
Countouris N., De Stefano V., Piasna A., Rainone S. (eds), The future of remote work, Brussels, ETUI, 2023.
Countouris N., De Stefano, V.Collective-bargaining rights for platform workers, Social Europe, 6th October, 2020, https://www.socialeurope.eu/collective-bargaining-rights-for-platform-workers
Countouris N. , De Stefano V., New Trade Union Strategies for New Forms of Employment, Brussels: ETUC, 2019.
Council of the European Union, Press Release. Platform workers: Council Confirms Agreement on New Rules to Improve their Working Conditions, 2024.
Council of the European Union, Proposal for the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work - Analysis of the final compromise text with a view to agreement, Brussels, 8 March, 2024.
De Stefano V., Aloisi A., European legal framework for digital labour platforms, Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.
EIGE, Gender differences in motivation to engage in platform work”, EIGE, 2023.
EIGE, Artificial Intelligence, Platform Work and Gender Equality, Publications office of the European Union, Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.
EIGE, Gender Equality Index 2020 – Digitalisation and the future of work, Publications Office of the European Union, 2020.
Ettlinger N., Algorithmic affordances for productive resistance, in Big Data & Society, 2018, 5, 1, n.p.
European Commission, Explanatory Memorandum, in Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM(2021) 762 final 2021/0414 (COD), 9.12.2021.
Eurofound, Initiatives to improve conditions for platform workers: Aims, methods, strengths and weaknesses, Publications Office of the European Union, 2021.
Eurofound, Online platform Helpling is not allowed to charge any commission to cleaners, in Platform Economy Database, 2019, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/platformeconomydb/online-platform-helpling-is-not-allowed-to-charge-any-commission-to-cleaners-103443
Eurofound, Employment and working conditions of selected types of platform work, Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.
European Parliament, Working conditions and precarious employment. European Parliament resolution of 4 July 2017 on working conditions and precarious employment, 2018, 2016/2221(INI) 2018/C 334/09.
Foong E., Vincent N., Hecht B., Gerber E.M., Women (Still) Ask for Less: Gender Differences in Hourly Rate in an Online Labor Marketplace, in Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction, 2018, 2. CSCW, Article 53.
Gerber C., Gender and precarity in platform work: Old inequalities in the new world of work. In New Technology, Work and Employment, 2022, 37, 206-230.
Gigpedia, The Netherlands - HELPLING / Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging (FNV), September 2021, https://gigpedia.org/research/court-cases/september-2021-the-netherlands-helpling-federatie-nederlandse-vakbeweging-fnv
Graham, M., Regulate, replicate, and resist – the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism, in Urban Geography, 2020, 41, 3, 453-457.
Gruszka K., Pillinger A., Gerold S., Theine H., (De)valuation of household cleaning in the platform economy, in WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Ecological Economic Papers, 44, 2022, 1-26.
Haidinger B., Saupe B., Schörpf P., Why the Sectoral Context Matters for Platform Work, in S. Mezzadra, N. Cuppini, M. Frapporti, M. Pirone (eds.), Capitalism in the Platform Age. Springer Studies in Alternative Economics, Springer, 2024.
Heiland H., Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview, WSI Study, No. 21. Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Wirtschafts und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut (WSI), 2020, https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020102613561185731705
Helpling, “We are looking for you”, 2024 https://www.helpling.de/de_en/anmelden/
Huws U., The hassle of housework: Digitalization and the commodification of domestic labour, in Feminist Review, 2019, 123, 1, 8-23.
Jahanbakhsh F., Cranshaw J., Counts S., Lasecki WS., Inkpen K., An experimental study of bias in platform worker ratings: the role of performance quality and gender, in ACM|CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems USB, 2020, 1-13.
James A., Platform Work-Lives in the Gig Economy: Recentering Work–Family Research, in Gender, Work & Organization, 2024, 513-534.
James A., Temple J., Newbridge Art Project – ‘Workforce’. Feminising the Platform Economy? 2019, https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/256646.
Jarrett K., Through the Reproductive Lens: Labour and Struggle at the Intersection of Culture and Economy, in D. Chandler, C. Fuchs, (eds.) Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data, London: University of Westminster Press, 2019, 103-116.
Jarret K. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. London: Routledge, 2016.
Joyce S., Neuman T., Trappmann V., Umney C., A global struggle: worker protest in the platform economy, ETUI Policy Brief, 2020 https://www.etui.org/publications/policy-briefs/european-economic-employment-and-social-policy/a-global-struggle-worker-protest-in-the-platform-economy.
Kluzik V., Governing invisibility in the platform economy: Excavating the logics of platform care, in Internet Policy Review, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, Berlin, 2022, 11, 1, 1-21.
Kambouri N., Affect, Precarity and Feminised Labour in Airbnb in London, in S. Mezzadra, N. Cuppini, M. Frapporti, M. Pirone (eds.), Capitalism in the Platform Age. Emerging Assemblages of Labour and Welfare in Urban Spaces, London: Springer, 2024, 151-166.
Kambouri E., Gendering platform research Theoretical and methodological considerations, in Work organisation, labour & globalisation, 2022, 16, 1, 14-33.
Koh V., Li W., Livan G., Capra, L., Offline biases in online platforms: A study of diversity and homophily in Airbnb, in EPJ Data Science, 2019, 8. 11.
Koutsimpogiorgos N., Frenken K., Herrmann A. M., Platform adaptation to regulation: The case of domestic cleaning in Europe, in Journal of Industrial Relations, 2023, 65, 2, 156-184.
Ma, N.F., Rivera, V.F., Yao, Z. and Yoon, D., Brush it Of”: How Women Workers Manage and Cope with Bias and Harassment in Gender-agnostic Gig Platforms, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 29-May 5, New Orleans, 2022.
Mexi M., Kokkinou, C., Crisis, deregulation and the rise of the gig economy: Greek industrial relations and social partnership under stress?, in C. Fernández Rodríguez, M. Martínez Lucio, Work and Employment Relations in Southern Europe: The Impact of De-regulation, Organizational Change and Social Fragmentation on Worker Representation and Action, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, 93-112.
National Domestic Workers Alliance, Benefits for house cleaners, 2021, https://www.ndwalabs.org/alia-benefits.
Pateman C., The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
Pulignano V. Work in deregulated labour markets: A research agenda for precariousness, in ETUI Research Working Paper 2019, 03, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
Renan Barzilay A., The Technologies of Discrimination: How Platforms Cultivate Gender Inequality, in The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 2019, 13, 2, 2019, 179-202.
Schor J.B., Attwood-Charles W., Cansoy M. et al., Dependence and precarity in the platform economy, in Theory and Society, 2020, 49, 833-861.
Schor J.B., Vallas S.P., The Sharing Economy: Rhetoric and Reality, in Annual Review of Sociology, 2021, 47, 369-389.
Squires J., Public and private, in R. Bellamy, A. Mason (eds.), Political concepts, Manchester University Press, 2023, 131–144 http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt155jbcx.15
Schwiter K., Steiner J., Geographies of care work: The commodification of care, digital care futures and alternative caring visions, in Geography Compass, 2020, 14, 12, n.p.
Ticona J., Mateescu A., Trusted strangers: Care platforms´ cultural entrepreneurship in the on- demand economy, New Media & Society, 2018, 20, 11, 4384-4404.
Tubaro P., Coville M., Le Ludec C., Casilli A., Hidden inequalities: the gendered labour of women on micro-tasking platforms, in Internet Policy Review, 2022, 11, 1, n.p.
Van Doorn N., Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy, in Information, Communication & Society, 2017, 20, 6, 898-914.
Umney C., Stuart M., Bessa I., Joyce S., Neumann D., Trappmann V., Platform Labour Unrest in a Global Perspective: How, Where and Why Do Platform Workers Protest?, in Work, Employment and Society, 2024, 38, 1, 3-26.
Wallis M., Digital Labour and Social Reproduction – Crowdwork in Germany and Romania, in Spheres: Journal of Digital Cultures, 2021, #6 https://spheres-journal.org/contribution/digital-labour-and-social-reproduction-crowdwork-in-germany-and-romania/
Weeks K., The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries, Duke University Press, 2011.
Weber C.E., Okraku M., Mair J., Maurer I., Steering the transition from informal to formal service provision: labor platforms in emerging-market countries, in Socio-Economic Review, 2021, 19, 4, October, 1315-1344.
Wood A. J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V., Hjorth I., Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy, in Work, Employment & Society, 2019, 33, 1, 56-75.
Wood A.J., Martindale N., Lehdonvirta V., Dynamics of contention in the gig economy: rage against the platform, customer or state?, in New Technology, Work and Employment, 2023, 38, 2, 330-350.
Woodcock, J., Graham M., The gig economy: A critical introduction, 2020, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zwick A., Welcome to the Gig Economy: neoliberal industrial relations and the case of Uber, in GeoJournal, 2018, 83, 4, 679-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nelli Kambouri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
