The Abortion Platformization in the United States: A Critical Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/20894Keywords:
digital platforms, abortion, digital health and privacy, data protection, gender and the lawAbstract
The article delves into the topic of digital abortion in the United States, focusing on how the possibility of obtaining an abortion through mifepristone has transitioned into the digital realm and how the law might support, reinforce, challenge, or be challenged by gender dynamics. With these objectives, first, the contribution traces the historical and legal evolution that drove the abortion platformization – in other words, the digitalization of abortion services via online platforms – highlighting how this evolution led to the structuring of a digital abortion ecosystem. In a second moment, the challenges faced by this digital abortion ecosystem during the Roe era – when abortion was still recognized as a constitutional right – are underlined. Finally, the contribution moves to analyze the consequences for this ecosystem’s users and workers of the Supreme Court ruling Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe v. Wade returning abortion regulation to the states.
References
Aid Access Compliance against FDA <https://aidaccess.org/en/media/inline/2019/9/9/19_09_09_verified_complaint_with_exhibits-420116928.pdf> accessed February 11, 2024.
Aiken A.R.A., Starling J.E., van der Wal A., et al., Demand for Self-Managed Medication Abortion Through an Online Telemedicine Service in the United States, in American Journal of Public Health, 2020, 110, 1, 90.
Aiken A.R.A., Starling J.E., Gomperts R., Factors Associated with Use of an Online Telemedicine Service to Access Self-managed Medical Abortion in the US, in JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4, 5.
Aiken A.R.A., Starling J.E., Scott J.G., Gomperts R., Association of Texas Senate Bill 8 With Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion, in JAMA Netw Open, 2022, 5, 2.
Aiken A.R.A., Starling J.E., van Blitterswijk D.C., et al., Advance Provision of Mifepristone and Misoprostol via Online Telemedicine in the US, in JAMA Internal Medicine, 2024, 184, 2, 220.
Alta Charo R., A Politic History of RU-486 in K.E. Hanna (eds) Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Study Decision Making, Biomedical Politics, Washington DC: National Academies Press, 1991.
Anger H.A., Raymond E.G., Grant M., et al., Clinical and service delivery implications of omitting ultrasound before medication abortion provided via direct-to-patient telemedicine and mail in the U.S, Contraception, 2021, 104, 6, 659.
Baker C.N., History and politics of medication abortion in the US and the rise of telemedicine and self-managed abortion, in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2023, 48,4, 485.
Celand K., Foster A.M., Machikanti Gómez A., Westhoff C. L., Raymond E.G., Special Issue on the mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), Contraception, 2021, 104, 1, 1.
Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), Profiting from deceit. How Google Profits from Anti-Choice Ads distorting searches for Reproductive Healthcare, 2023, <https://counterhate.com/research/google-profiting-from-fake-abortion-clinics-ads/> accessed February 8, 2024.
Chong E., Telabortion: a new direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the USA, April 28, 2016, <https://www.safeabortionwomensright.org/news/telabortion-a-new-direct-to-patient-telemedicine-abortion-service-in-the-usa/> accessed February 4, 2024.
Cohen D.S., Donley G., Rebouché R., The New Abortion Battleground, in Columbia Law University, 2023, 23, 1.
Cohen D.S., Donley G., Rebouché R., Abortion Shield Laws, New England Journal of Medicine Evidence, 2023, 2, 4; Guttmacher Institute, Interactive map: US abortion policies and access after Roe <https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/hawaii/abortion-policies> accessed February 8, 2024.
Cohen D.S., Donley G., Rebouché R., Abortion Pills, in Stanford Law Review, 2023, 76, <https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/554> accessed February 9, 2024.
Food and Drug Administration,
Initial US Approval Mifeprex (mifepristone) tablets, 2000, <https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2000/20687_mifepristone.cfm> accessed February 5, 2024.
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), Mifeprex NDA 20-687, 2011, <https://www.fda.gov/media/164648/download?attachment> accessed February 4, 2024.
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), Mifeprex NDA 020687’, 2016, <https://www.fda.gov/media/164649/download?attachment> accessed February 5, 2024.
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Single Shared System for Mifepristone 200mg, 2019.
Warning Letter Aidaccess.org, 08 March 2019, MARCS-CMS 575658.
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Modification of Single Shared System for Mifepristone 200mg, 2021.
Questions and answers on Mifeprex, 2021.
Questions and Answers on Mifepristone for Medical Termination of Pregnancy Through Ten Weeks Gestation, January 2023, <https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/questions-and-answers-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation#TheJanuary2023REMSModification> accessed February 8, 2024.
Development and Approval Process, <https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs> accessed February 7, 2024.
Fox A., Manis E., Pregnancy Panopticon. Abortion Surveillance after Roe, Report Surveillance Technologies oversight project, May 2022.
Frank K.L., Nat Effects: how the Internet has changed Abortion Law, Policy, and Process, in William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 2022, 8, 2, 311.
Friedrich-Karnick A., Stoskopf-Ehrlich E., Jones R.K., Medication abortion within and outside the formal US health care system: what you need to know, Guttmacher Institute, < https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/02/medication-abortion-within-and-outside-formal-us-health-care-system-what-you-need-know> accessed February 8, 2024.
Garamvolgyi F., Why US women are deleting their period tracking apps, in The Guardian, 28 June 2022, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/28/why-us-woman-are-deleting-their-period-tracking-apps> accessed February 11, 2024.
Gordon L., The Moral Property of Women: A History of Birth Control Politics in America, University of Illinois Press, 2002.
Grindlay K., Lane K., Grossman D., Women's and providers’ experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study, in Women’s Health Issues, 2013, 23, 2, 117.
Grindlay K., Grossman D., Telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Alaska: Through the provider's lens, in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2017, 23, 7, 680.
Grossman D., Grindlay K., Buchacker T., et al., Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine, in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 118, 2, 1, 296.
Grossman D., Grindlay K., Safety of Medical Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine Compared with in Person, in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, 130, 4, 778.
Han L., Boniface E.R., Han L.Y., et al., The Abortion Web Ecosystem: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Trustworthiness and Bias, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2020, 22, 10, e20619.
Haraway D.J., Manifesto Cyborg. Donne, tecnologie e biopolitiche del corpo, trans. L Borghi, 4th Edition, Feltrinelli 2021.
Harvey A., Feminist Media Studies, 1st Edition, Polity Press, 2019.
Harvey T., Sheldon S., Abortion by telemedicine in the European Union, in International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 145, 1, 125.
Hogan J.A., The Life of the Abortion pills in United States (2000 Third Year Paper), Harvard Law School Student Paper, <http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8852153> accessed February 5, 2024.
Huss L., Diaz-Tiello F., Samari G., Self-Care, criminalized: Preliminary Findings, If, When, How: advocates for Reproductive Justice, 2022.
Huss L., Diaz-Tiello F., Samari G., Self-care criminalized. The criminalization of self-managed abortion from 2000 to 2020, If, When, How: advocates for Reproductive Justice Special Report, 2023.
Kaller S., Daniel S., Raifman S., et al., Pre-Abortion Informed Consent Through Telemedicine vs. in Person: Differences in Patient Demographics and Visit Satisfaction, in Womens Health Issues, 2021, 31, 3, 227.
Keegan J., Kerr D., Online Abortion pills providers Hey Jane used tracking tools that sent visitors to Meta, Google and others, in The Markup, July 2022, <https://themarkup.org/pixel-hunt/2022/07/01/online-abortion-pill-provider-hey-jane-used-tracking-tools-that-sent-visitor-data-to-meta-google-and-others> accessed February 11, 2024.
Landi H. Digital Abortion Providers, doctors brace for the complex legal landscape after SCOTUS ruling, Fierce Health Care, 27 June 2022, <https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/digital-abortion-providers-doctors-brace-complex-legal-landscape-after-scotus-ruling> accessed February 8, 2024.
Mark A., Foster A.M., Perritt J., The future of abortion is now: Mifepristone by mail and in-clinic abortion access in the United States, in Contraception, 2021, 104, 1, 38.
Meister M., Levy K., Digital Security and Reproductive Rights: Lessons for Feminist Cyberlaw, in M.L. Jones, A. Levendowski (eds), Feminist Cyberlaw, University of California Press, 2024.
Nash E., Ephross P., State Policy Trends in 2022: In a Devastating Year, US Supreme Court’s Decision to Overturn Roe Leads to Bans, Confusion and Chaos, 2022, Guttmacher Institute, < https://www.guttmacher.org/2022/12/state-policy-trends-2022-devastating-year-us-supreme-courts-decision-overturn-roe-leads> accessed February 8, 2024.
Nash E., Guarnieri I., 13 States Have Abortion Trigger Bans – Here’s What Happens When Roe is Overturned (June 6, 2022), Guttmacher Institute, <https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/06/13-states-have-abortion-trigger-bans-heres-what-happens-when-roe-overturned> accessed February 8, 2024.
Noah L., A Miscarriage in the Drug Approval Process: Mifepristone Embroils the FDA in Abortion Politics, in Wake Forest Law Review, 2001,136, 571.
Park E., Reproductive Health Care Data Free or For Sale: Post-Roe Surveillance and the “Three Corners” of Privacy Legislation Needed, in Richmond Journal of Law and Technologies, 2023, 30, 185.
Paul K., Facebook and Instagram removing posts with mentions of abortion pills, in The Guardian, 28 June 2022, <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jun/28/facebook-instagram-meta-abortion-pills-posts> accessed February 11, 2024.
Raymond E.G., Grossman D., Wiebe E., Winikoff B., Reaching women where they are: eliminating the initial in-person medical abortion visit, in Contraception, 2015, 92, 3, 190.
Raymond E.G., Chong E., Hyland P., Increasing access to abortion with telemedicine, in JAMA Internal Medicine, 2016, 176, 5, 585.
Raymond E.G., Chong E., Winikoff B., et al., TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States, in Contraception, 2019, 100, 3, 173.
Reznick Y., Survey reveals the apps Americans trust least with their data, Secure Data Recovery, January 2023 <https://www.securedatarecovery.com/blog/apps-people-trust-least#:~:text=Women%27s%20health%20apps%20are%20the,more%20open%20to%20data%20collection> accessed February 11, 2024.
SIA Legal Team, Roe’s Unfinished Promise: Decriminalizing Abortion Once and for All, Special Report October 2018.
Siegel R.B., Memory Games: Dobb’s Originalism as Anti-Democratic Living Constitutionalism and some Pathways of Resistance, in Texas Law Review, 2023, 101,1.
Upadhyay U.D., Johns N.E., Meckstroth K.R., Kerns J.L., Distance Traveled for an Abortion and Source of Care After Abortion, in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, 130, 3, 616.
Upadhyay U.D., Schroeder R., Roberts S.C.M., Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19, in Contraception, 2:100049, 2020.
US Department of Health and Human Services, HITECH Breach Notification Interim Final Rule, Federal Register, 78, 17, January 2013.
Yang Y.T., Kozhimannil K., Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court, in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 127, 2, 313.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tamara Roma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
