Deepening or buffering the crisis of social reproduction under capitalism? The case of digital care and domestic work platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/20886Keywords:
care and domestic services platforms, social reproduction, capitalism, Italy, European Directive on Platform workAbstract
This study investigates platform companies offering care and domestic services through the lens of social reproduction theory. This perspective embeds these platforms in capitalism by foregrounding the fundamental dependence of the capitalist economy on the paid and unpaid socially reproductive work largely carried out by women in the home, communities, welfare state services and the (informal) market. Such work does not only reproduce life, but also, by so doing, the labor-power necessary to generate value in the economy. Based on five cases of care and domestic services platform companies operating in Italy, the analysis reveals their roots in the current crisis of social reproduction, or the ability of individuals, households and societies to socially reproduce life, through adequate care and income. We show how this crisis manifests itself in multiple forms in the lives of platforms’ clients and workers, who are both largely women. While all platforms claim to be the solution to this crisis, their effects are not univocal. On the one hand, platforms that operate as mere digital intermediaries deepen the crisis of social reproduction by expanding informal work on a large scale. On the other hand, platforms that proactively set the terms of employment foster the recognition of care and domestic work and workers’ better protection. The study advances the extant literature by showing how, while care and domestic services platforms do not resolve the crisis of social reproduction, they might either deepen or buffer it. Their effects depend on how their business model and the related legal work status they offer to workers distribute costs, risks and value among workers and their households, customers, platforms themselves and the state. Distinct from legal perspectives, a social reproduction theory lens emphasizes how the different legal work statuses offered to care and domestic platform workers open up possibilities for their social struggles, whose outcomes however remain open-ended.
References
Arcidiacono D., Bonifacio F., Pais I., Professionalization and informality in platform care services. The case of Babysits, in Critical Sociology, forthcoming.
Bakker I., Gill S., Power, Production, and Social Reproduction: Human In/security in the Global Political Economy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Brenner J, Laslett B. Gender, social reproduction, and women's self-organization: Considering the US welfare state, in Gender & Society, 1991, 5, 3, 311-33.
Benvegnù C., Kampouri N., Platformization beyond the point of production: Reproductive labor and gender roles in the ride-hailing and food-delivery sectors, in South Atlantic Quarterly, 2021, 120, 4, 733-747.
Bettio F., Simonazzi A., Villa P., Change in care regimes and female migration: the ‘care drain’ in the Mediterranean, in Journal of European social policy, 2006, 16, 3, 271-285.
Bhattacharya T., Introduction: Mapping Social Reproduction Theory, in T. Bhattacharya (ed.), Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, London: Pluto Press, 2017.
Bhattacharya T., How Not to Skip Class: Social Reproduction of Labor and the Global Working Class, in T. Bhattacharya, Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, London: Pluto Press 2017.
Braedley S., Luxton M., Foreword, in K. Meehan, K. Strauss (ed.), Precarious Worlds. Contested Geographies of Social Reproduction, University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia (USA), 2015.
Berg J., Furrer M., Harmon E., Rani U., Silberman M.S., Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work. Towards Decent Work in the Online World, Geneva, International Labour Office, 2018.
Bezanson K., Luxton M., Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2006
Brenner J., Laslett B., Gender, social reproduction, and women's self-organization: Considering the US welfare state, in Gender & Society, 1991, 5, 3, 311-333.
Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K., Are we all Amazon primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power, in Comparative Political Studies, 2020, 53, 2, 288-318.
Dalla Costa M., Selma J., Women and the subversion of the community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press, 1972.
De Coster M., Zanoni P., More than prefigurative politics? Redefining the institutional frames to reduce precarity under neoliberal capitalism, in Organization Studies, 2023, 44, 6, 939-960. DOI: 10.1177/01708406221113110
De Novellis F., Il triennio peggiore per i salari italiani, in lavoce.info https://lavoce.info/archives/104554/il-triennio-peggiore-per-i-salari-italiani/, 2024.
De Vita L., Corasaniti A., Regulating Domestic and Care Work in Italy: Assessing the Relative Influence of the Familistic Model Today, in Critical Social Policy, 2022, 42, 3, 531-549.
De Vita L., Bertolini A., Underpaid or Uberpaid? The Platformisation of the Domestic and Care Work, in Critical Sociology, forthcoming.
European Union, Spotlight on digital platform workers in the EU, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/digital-platform-workers/, 2024.
Federici S., Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle, Oakland: PM Press, 2012.
Flanagan F., Theorising the Gig Economy and Home-Based Service Work, in Journal of Industrial Relations, 2019, 61, 1, 57–78.
Fraser N., Crisis of Care? On the Social-Reproductive Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism, in T. Bhattacharya (ed.), Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, London: Pluto Press, 2017.
Giangrande N., La questione salariale in Italia. Un’analisi sulle cause dei bassi salari, https://files.cgil.it/version/c:OTRiYzM2YWYtNTdhNi00:ZDI1MzAxYzItYzE5NC00/Studio%20Salari%20in%20Italia.pdf, 2024.
Gonalons-Pons P., Servants of production: The politics of domestic workers’ labor rights, in Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 2022, 29, 3, 932–954.
Hester H., Srnicek N., The crisis of social reproduction and the end of work, in The age of perplexity: Rethinking the World we Knew. Madrid, BBVA, OpenMind, Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial. Available at https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/articles/the-crisis-of-social-reproduction-and-the-end-of-work/, 2018.
Hunt A., Samman E., Gender and the Gig Economy: Critical Steps for Evidence-Based Policy, ODI Working Paper No. 546. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2019
Huws U., Labour in contemporary capitalism: what next?, Berlin: Springer, 2019.
Huws U., The hassle of housework: Digitalisation and the commodification of domestic labour, in Feminist Review, 2019, 123, 8-23.
Koutsimpogiorgos N., Frenken K., Herrmann A. M., Platform adaptation to regulation: The case of domestic cleaning in Europe, in Journal of Industrial Relations, 65, 2, 2023, 156-184.
Istat, Rapporto annuale 2023. La situazione del Paese, https://www.istat.it/storage/rapporto-annuale/2023/Rapporto-Annuale-2023.pdf, 2023.
Istat, Indicatori demografici anno 2023, https://www.istat.it/it/files//2024/03/Indicatori_demografici.pdf, 2024.
Jaehrling K., Pereyra F., Poblete L., Special Issue: The formalization of paid domestic work: Current trajectories and challenges ahead, in International Labour Review, 2024, 163, 3.
Jaehrling K., Pereyra F., Poblete L., Introduction: The formalization of paid domestic work – Current trajectories and challenges ahead, in International Labour Review, 2024, 163, 3, 359-377.
Joyce S., Rediscovering the cash nexus, again: Subsumption and the labour–capital relation in platform work, in Capital & Class, 2020, 44, 4, 541-552.
Kambouri E., Gendering platform research, in Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 2022, 16, 1, 14-33.
Katz C., Marston S. A., Mitchell K., Demanding Life’s Work, in K. Meehan, K. Strauss Kendra (ed.), Precarious Worlds. Contested Geographies of Social Reproduction, University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia (USA), 2015.
Kocher E., Digital work platforms at the interface of labour law: regulating market organisers, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.
Langley P., Leyshon A., Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation, in Finance and Society, 2017, 3, 1, 11-31.
Lazzarato, M. Governing by debt. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext, 2015.
Osservatorio DOMINA sul Lavoro Domestico, 4° Rapporto annuale sul lavoro domestico, https://www.osservatoriolavorodomestico.it/rapporto-annuale-lavoro-domestico-2022, 2022.
Marzo C., Franco-British comparison of attempts to provide social protection for platform workers at the time of the pandemic: towards a new balance between public and private actors?, in Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale, 2021, 4, 80-99.
Marzo C., The EU proposal of directive on platform work in P. Dieuaide, D. Kesselman (eds.), Platform work and grey zones, Teseo, 2024, forthcoming.
Mezzadri A., Social reproduction and pandemic neoliberalism: Planetary crises and the reorganisation of life, work and death, in Organization, 2022, 29, 3, 379-400.
Morini C., Vite lavorate: Corpi, valore, resistenze al disamore, Roma: Manifestolibri, 2022.
Pais I. (ed.), Il welfare alla prova delle piattaforme, Milano: Fondazione Feltrinelli, 2024.
Pais I., Marcolin A., Digital platforms in the Italian domestic care sector: The emergence of an unprecedented corporate logic and its implications for workers’ social protection, in International Labour Review, 2024, 163, 3, 397-415.
Poblete, L., Pereyra, F., Tizziani, A., Digital Intermediation in Paid Domestic Work in Argentina: An Analysis of Ambivalent Effects on Working Conditions, in Critical Sociology, 2024, online first.
Rodríguez-Modroño P., Agenjo-Calderón A., López-Igual P., A Feminist Political Economic Analysis of Platform Capitalism in the Care Sector, in Review of Radical Political Economics, 2023, 55, 4, 629–638.
Scholz T., Platform cooperativism: Challenging the corporate sharing economy, New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, 2016.
Schor J. B., Vallas S. P., Labor and the platform economy, in B. Heydari, O. Ergun, R. Dyal-Chand, Y. Bart (eds.), Reengineering the Sharing Economy: Design, Policy, and Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Solera C., Cura e riproduzione sociale: ripensare la cittadinanza, in Parolechiave, 2020, 2, 129-138, doi: 10.7377/100542
Smorto G., Protecting the weaker parties in the platform economy, in N. M. Davidson, M. Finck, J. J. Infranca (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of the law of the sharing economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Stark D., Pais I., Algorithmic management in the platform economy, in Sociologica, 2020, 14.3, 47-72.
Tandon A., Rathi A., Care in the platform economy: Interrogating the digital organisation of domestic work in India, in The Gig Economy, London: Routledge, 2020.
Ticona J., Red flags, sob stories, and scams: The contested meaning of governance on carework labor platforms, in New Media & Society, 2022, 24, 7, 1548-1566.
Ticona J., Mateescu A., Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy, in New Media & Society, 2018, 20, 11, 4384-4404.
Ticona J., Mateescu A., Rosenblat A., Beyond disruption: How tech shapes labor across domestic work and ridehailing, https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Data_Society_Beyond_Disruption_FINAL.pdf, 2018.
Toupin L., Wages for housework. London: Pluto Press, 2018.
Tronti M., La fabbrica e la società [The factory and society], Quaderni Rossi, 1962, 2,1-31.
van Doorn N., Vijay D., Gig Work as Migrant Work: The Platformization of Migration Infrastructure, in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211065049.
Vogel L., Marxism and the Oppression of Women, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1983.
Wallis M., Digital labour and social reproduction–Crowdwork in Germany and Romania, in spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures, 2021, 6, 1-14.
Weeks K., The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries, Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.
World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2023, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf
Yeates N., Global care chains: a state‐of‐the‐art review and future directions in care transnationalization research, in Global Networks, 2012, 12, 2, 135-154.
Yin S., Situating platform gig economy in the formal subsumption of reproductive labor: Transnational migrant domestic workers and the continuum of exploitation and precarity, in Capital & Class, 2024, 48, 1, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168221145407
Zanoni P., Labor market inclusion through predatory capitalism? The “sharing economy,” diversity, and the crisis of social reproduction in the Belgian coordinated market economy, in Work and labor in the digital age, 2019, 33, 145-164.
Zanoni P., Whither Critical Management and Organization Studies? For a performative critique of capitalist flows in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, in Journal of Management Studies, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12655
Zanoni P., Social reproduction theory as lens and method: Multiplying struggles for equality beyond the workplace, in K. Saija, E. Bell, S. Meriläinen (eds.), Handbook of Feminist Methodologies in Management and Organization Studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2024, 123-139.
Zanoni P., Pitts F. H., Inclusion through the platform economy?: The ‘diverse’ crowd as relative surplus populations and the pauperisation of labour, in The Routledge Handbook of the Gig Economy. London:Routledge, 2022, 33-45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ivana Pais, Patrizia Zanoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
