Employer membership and collective bargaining in Italy: empirical evidence from an INAPP survey

Authors

  • Francesca Bergamante INAPP researcher
  • Manuel Marocco INAPP researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/8788

Keywords:

two-tier system of bargaining, decentralisation of collective bargaining, Italian firms

Abstract

Decentralization of collective bargaining is considered a key element to introduce innovations and changes work’s organization. Since 2011, European institutions too have promoted the dissemination of collective agreements more sensitive to corporate market conditions.

What is the role of employer’s associations in this context?

The article intends to provide an analysis in this regard, using data from the INAPP-RIL survey conducted on a sample of about 26,000 Italian firms. After studying the trend of membership rates and membership density over time, as well as the determinants that influence membership, the article focuses on the latter's influence on the dissemination and coverage of collective cross-sector bargaining.

On the basis of the main evidence contained in the descriptive analyses, it may seemingly be stated that the barycentre of the Italian collective bargaining system - the «National Collective Labour Agreement» - has not been affected by the European, legislative and social partners “multilevel” drive in favour of its decentralisation.

Indeed the multi-employer bargaining has continued to be applied outside of an association membership logic: there has been an increase in the share of firms that state to apply a sectoral agreement spontaneously, without joining an Employers’ Association. The Employers’ Association fragmentation is a context which conceals the proliferation of the so called Pirate Agreements, that is a system characterised by a self-opting out of the collective agreement.

At the same time, and perhaps for the same reasons, second-level bargaining is at a standstill. In fact, traditional motivations related to competitiveness continue to make it preferable for small and medium sized firms to maintain the centrality of the national sectoral collective agreement.

References

Baccaro L. - Howell C., Il cambiamento delle Relazioni industriali nel capitalismo avanzato: una traiettoria comune in direzione neoliberista, in Verso nuove relazioni industriali, a cura di Carrieri M. - Treu T., Bologna, Il Mulino, 2013.

Biagi M, Il ruolo delle parti sociali: dal dialogo alla partnership, in DRI, 1999, 1, IX, p. 25.

Boeri T., Two-Tier Bargaining, in IZA Discussion Paper, n. 8358/2014, https://goo.gl/846G2J.

Boeri T., Perverse effects of two-tier wage bargaining structures, in IZA World of Labor, 2017, https://goo.gl/6ZiRaq.

Bongelli K., The impact of the European Semester on collective bargaining and wages over the recent years, in WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”.INT − 138/2017.

Bordogna L. - Pedersini R., Economic crisis, new EU economic governance and the regulation of labour, Paper for ILERA, CAPE TOWN, 2015, https://goo.gl/BdQiTa.

Clauwaert S., The country-specific recommendations (CSRs) in the social field. An overview and comparison. Update including the CSRs 2017-2018, Etui, 2017, https://goo.gl/uXGJXP.

D’Amuri F. - Nizzi R., I recenti sviluppi delle relazioni industriali in Italia, in Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 416, Banca d’Italia, Economic Research and International Relations Area, 2017, https://goo.gl/NM2KDJ.

Kangur A., Competitiveness and Wage Bargaining Reform in Italy, in IMF Working Paper, n. 2018/61, https://goo.gl/wNR5SR.

Leonardi S. - Ambra M.C. - Ciarini A., Italian collective bargaining at a turning point, in WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – 139/2017.

Leoni R. - Bisio L., Che cosa sappiamo sull’efficacia della contrattazione integrativa aziendale? Una rassegna della letteratura empirica italiana, in ADAPT Working paper n. 2/2017.

Liso F., Qualche erratica considerazione sul recente accordo interconfederale Confindustria, Cgil, Cisl e Uil del 9 marzo 2018, Bollettino Adapt, 23 aprile 2018, https://goo.gl/WEcDHm.

Magnani M., The Role of Collective Bargaining in Italian Labour Law, in EJICLS, 2018, vol. 7, 2 https://goo.gl/kmL6oq.

Marginson P., Coordinated bargaining in Europe: From incremental corrosion to frontal assault?, in EJIR, 2015, vol. 21, 2, p. 97.

Menegatti E., Challenging the EU Downward Pressure on National Wage Policy, IJCLLIR, 2017, vol. 33, 2, p. 195.

Oecd, OECD Employment Outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2017-en.

Regalia I. - Regini M., Trade Unions and Employment Relations in Italy during the Economic Crisis, South European Society and Politics, 2018, vol. 23, 1, p. 63.

Sacchi S., Conditionality by other means: EU involvement in Italy’s structural reforms in the sovereign debt crisis, in Comparative European Politics, 2015, vol. 13, 1, p. 77.

Treu T., La contrattazione collettiva in Europa, in DRI, 2018, 2, p. 372.

Scarponi S., La dottrina giuslavoristica italiana di fronte al mutamento delle relazioni sindacali e alla questione della rappresentatività, in WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”.IT, n. 295/2016.

Sciarra S., Social law in the wake of the crisis, in WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – n. 108/2014.

Visser J., What happened to collective bargaining during the great re-cession?, in IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2016, 5, p. 9, https://goo.gl/XGqv6p.

Published

2018-12-17

How to Cite

Bergamante, F., & Marocco, M. (2018). Employer membership and collective bargaining in Italy: empirical evidence from an INAPP survey. Labour & Law Issues, 4(2), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/8788

Issue

Section

Essays