El trabajo entre el derecho y la economía: de la economía digital al Derecho romano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2421-2695/25753Palabras clave:
trabajo digital, trabajo de plataforma, condición jurídica del trabajador, prestación de serviciosResumen
La economía digital ha impulsado el rápido desarrollo del trabajo en plataformas, mientras que el marco regulatorio tradicional del derecho laboral ha ido mostrando progresivamente deficiencias tanto en su ámbito de cobertura como en su capacidad interpretativa. La gobernanza algorítmica y los mecanismos institucionales de deslaboralización de la relación de trabajo han situado a un gran número de trabajadores en una zona gris entre el derecho laboral y el derecho civil, dando lugar a una protección fragmentada de sus derechos.
Las normas relativas al trabajo en el Derecho romano no partían de la identidad del trabajador, sino que se centraban en el hecho social de la prestación de servicios. Mediante diferentes tipos contractuales, el Derecho romano distinguía el proceso de trabajo del resultado del trabajo, asignando en consecuencia los derechos y las obligaciones. Esta lógica institucional ofrece una nueva perspectiva para replantear la legislación laboral china en el contexto de la economía digital. Las normas laborales no tienen por qué tomar el reconocimiento de la condición de trabajador como único presupuesto; por el contrario, deberían pasar de un enfoque basado en la identidad a otro basado en la prestación de servicios, respondiendo a la evolución diversificada de las formas de trabajo mediante una valoración multifactorial y una regulación diferenciada.
Citas
Albertario E., Istituzioni Di Diritto Romano, Giuffré, 1931.
Berg J., Income Security in the On-Demand Economy: Findings and Policy Lessons from a Survey of Crowdworkers, in CLLPJ, 2024, 37, 3.
Birks P. - Mcleod G. - Krueger P., Justinian's Institutes, Cornell University Press, 1987.
Blackham A., “We are All Entrepreneurs Now”: Options and New Approaches for Adapting Equality Law for the “Gig Economy” in IJCLLIR, 2018, 34, 4.
Buckland W. W., A Manual of Roman Private Law, Cambridge University Press, 1939.
Buckland W. W., A Text-Book of Roman Law: From Augustus to Justinian, Cambridge University Press, 1971.
Busby N. - Zahn R., Less than Zero? The Fragmentation of Worker Protection in UK Employment Law and the Promise of an Alternative Economy, in CLLPJ, 2024, 44, 1.
Chen L., Labour Order under Digital Control: A Study on the labour Control of Take-out Platform Riders, in Sociological Studies, 2020, 35, 6.
Cherry M. A., Beyond Misclassification: The Digital Transformation of Work, in CLLPJ, 2016, 37, 3.
Cherry M. A. - Aloisi A., Dependent Contractors in the Gig Economy: A Comparative Approach, in American University Law Review, 2017, 66, 3.
Civil Judgment of the People’s Court of Haidian District, Beijing Municipality, (2017) Jing 0108 Min Chu No. 53634.
Civil Judgment of the People’s Court of Changshou District, Chongqing Municipality, (2020) Yu 0115 Min Chu No. 4857.
Civil Judgment of the People’s Court of Zhonglou District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, (2020) Su 0404 Min Chu No. 5145.
Civil Judgment of the First Intermediate People’s Court of Chongqing Municipality, (2021) Yu 01 Min Zhong No. 780.
Civil Judgment of the Suzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province, (2024) Su 05 Min Zhong No. 14032.
Davidov G. - Langille B., The Idea of Labour Law, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Kasel M. - Knutel R. - Lohsse S., Derecho Privado Romano, Agencia Estatal Boletin Oficial del Estado, 2022.
Leage R. W., Roman Private Law: Founded On The Institutes Of Gaius And Justinian, Macmillan and Co. Limited, 1924.
Lee R.W., The Elements of Roman Law, Sweet & Maxwell Limited, 1944.
Li K. - Wang Y., A Reflection on Legislations concerning Gray Area Employment in China and Possibilities for Future, in Journal of AnHui University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2020, 44, 2.
Lin J. - Zhu J., The Impact of the Diversity of labour on labour Law and the Paradigm Reformation of Labour Law, in Law and Economy, 2024,10, 6.
Lou Y., Rules for the Identification of Legal Relationship of New Employment Forms, in China Legal Science, 2024,41, 5.
Lou Y. - S. Peng., Legal Regulation of Algorithms in Platform Employment and Protection of Workers' Rights in New Forms of Employment: A Study Based on the Theory of "Incomplete labour Relations" , in Journal of China University of Labour Relations, 2025, 39, 5.
Mousourakis G., Fundamentals of Roman Private Law, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
Mousourakis G., Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition, Springer International Publishing, 2015.
Rani U. - Singh P. J., Digital Platforms, Data, and Development: Implications for Workers in Developing Economies, in CLLPJ, 2019, 41, 1.
Sohm R., The Institutes of Roman Law, James Crawford Ledlie translated, Gorgias Press, 2002.
Shen J., Qualitative Analyses and Legal Application of Incomplete labour Relations in New Forms of Employment, in Study & Exploration, 2024, 45, 12.
Shen W. - Sun G., The Legislative Structure and Application of Incomplete Labour Relations, in Journal of Soochow University(Law Edition), 2025, 12, 1.
Sun P., Digital labour within the Logic of Algorithms: A Study of Food Delivery Workers in Platform Economy, in Thinking, 2019, 45, 6.
Talamanca M., Istituzioni di diritto romano, Giuffrè, 1990.
Tian S., Subordinate labour Theory in Age of Industrial 4.0, in Law Review, 2019, 37, 1.
Tian S., The Contractual Nature of "Incomplete labour Rehationship" and the Relative Protection of Workers--From the Analytical Perspective of the "Dichotomy" and "Trichotomy" of Law Application, in Global Law Review, 2024, 46, 5.
Tian S. - Zheng C., Identity Testing for Platform Practitioners under Algorithmic Affiliation, in Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2024, 38, 5.
Voci P., Istituzioni di diritto romano, Edizioni Simone, 2004, 3.
Wang Q., Labour Law, Law Press China, 2017.
Wang T., The Governance Model of “labour Trichotomy” for Platform Employment, in China Legal Sciernce, 2023, 40, 2.
Wang T., From Identity to Act: The Transformation of Normative Structure in labour Law, in Social Sciences in China, 2025, 46, 5.
Wang T., Beyond the "labour Dichotomy": A Study of the Basic Stand of the Platform's Employment Law Adjustment, in Journal of China University of Labour Relations, 2020, 34, 4.
Wu Q. - Li Z., Labour Process Control and Job Autonomy in SharingEconomy: A Case Study of Online Car-hailing Drivers Work, in Sociological Studies, 2018, 33, 4.
Xiao Z., Theoretical Explanation and System Construction of Subordination Criteria for labour Relationship Identification, in Law Science, 2021, 44, 2.
Xie Z., Normative Expression of the Concept and Recognition of Employment Relationships in the Digital Era in China, in Social Sciences in China, 2024, 45, 10.
Zheng W., The Obscured Subordination: the Key Core of "Internet labour Relationships" and Its Coordination Strategy--Taking Fast Delivery Persons as the Object of Observation, in Political Science and Law, 2024, 43, 8.
Zhu J., Theoretical Clarification and Normative Construction of the Determination of Employment Relationship, in Chinese Journal of Law, 2023, 45, 6.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Zhao Yi, Shen Weiqing
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
